Figure 1. The lava lake at Erta Ale volcano, Ethiopia. Source
|
Title: Explosive
eruptions triggered by rockfalls at Kilauea volcano, Hawai’i
Authors: Tim Orr, Weston Thelen, Matthew Patrick, Donald
Swanson, and David Wilson
GEOLOGY, February 2013
Article url: http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/41/2/207.full.pdf+html?sid=e7aadd52-ea48-4af4-87b2-1296a496130b
Lava lakes are fascinating
enough by themselves, while rockfalls can be entertaining to watch, given a
safe distance. But what happens when rock falls into a lava lake? Kilauea
volcano in Hawai’i (Figure 2) has erupted continuously since 2008, and webcams
have recorded the eruption since its onset. The lack of dangerous, explosive
eruptions from Hawaiian volcanoes allows recording devices to exist close by
and provide a constant view of the volcanoes and their craters. Cameras coupled
with seismic detection instruments produce an excellent record of the eruptions
and dynamics of the lava lake in Kilauea’s summit (Figure 3). One of the more
interesting features of this volcano is the visible interaction of rockfalls
into the lava lake. The overhanging crater walls frequently collapse into the
lava lake, resulting in explosive outgassing and sometimes the ejection of
tephra.
Figure 3. The lava lake as viewed from the webcam. Image from original article. |
The
lava lake was first visible in September 2008 and has since fluctuated in level
between 65 and 210 m below the rim of the vent. The best observed rockfalls
occurred between January and March 2011, during a period of rising lava level. Video
feed from a camera stationed along the rim of the crater (Figure 4) was used to
time rockfalls and subsequent explosive events. Most of the rockfalls
disaggregated and created a cloud of dust during descent (Figure 3). Relatively
small rockfalls produced small ash clouds when they impacted the lava lake
surface, while larger rockfalls resulted in larger clouds that deposited tephra
outside of the crater. The preexisting state of the lava, such as whether the
lava surface was calm or still responding to a previous rockfall impact,
appeared to have no effect on the eruptive response to a rockfall. This indicates that subsequent rockfalls are
just as likely to produce an explosive response as any previous rockfall event,
despite the previous disruption of the lava lake surface. While the camera
footage shows that all rockfalls trigger some explosive response, the reason is
largely unknown.
Figure 4. A rockfall in progress. A: The rockfall
momentarily after it begins to fall. B: The ash plume formed after the rockfall
impacted the lava lake. Image from original article.
|
The
scientists proposed an explanation for the explosive response to rockfalls
where the impacting rockfall caused a “backsplash” effect. These splashes are
called Worthington jet; a common, everyday example is the falling of raindrops
into a puddle. These Worthington jets can be 20-30 times faster than the speed
of whatever caused the jet and can sometimes rise higher than the height of the
dropped object. This appears to match with the observations of a more explosive
“jet” with increasing rockfall size, though the largest rockfalls tend to
produce too much ash for definitive confirmation. It is thought that these
rockfalls are creating a momentary impact crater in the lava, which then
collapses and forms a Worthington jet that ejects small bits of lava into the
air.
Worthington jet animation. From
|
Direct
camera observations are important for understanding the active processes at
Kilauea. These observations show us that rockfalls impacting a lava lake can
produce some explosive events and may form a Worthington jet, which has not
been documented before. Similar explosive events previously reported at Kilauea
and at other volcanoes may have resulted from such a triggering mechanism.
No comments:
Post a Comment