Photograph: CHRIS WEBBER (AP) |
Despite the
social and economic consequences caused by the 2010 Eyjafjallajokull eruption in Iceland was
relatively small, emitting only 0.24 cubic kilometers of material, enough ash
to fill 96 thousand Olympic swimming
pools. In comparison, the 1980 Mt. St. Helens eruption produced
four times as much ash and an ash plume twice the size as Eyjafjallajokull’s.
While no human lives were lost as a result of the eruption of Eyjafjallajokull,
its economic impact was outsized: the eruption of Mt. St. Helens cost US$2.74
billion (by todays estimates) while Eyjafjallajokull cost the global economy a
whopping US$5.13 billion.
So the big
question is how did an eruption a quarter of the size of Mt. St. Helens cause
so much economic destruction?
While there
are many factors that contribute to effects of a volcanic eruption (e.g.,
volcano location, location relative to major aviation routes), the presence of
a strong ambient wind had a major effect on Eyjafjallajokull. The strength of the surrounding winds was
much greater than the strength of the eruption column, causing it to bend. During the Mt. St. Helens eruption, weaker
ambient winds relative to a stronger eruption column allowed for the ash to
rise without bending – it only began to sheer when the ash formed an umbrella
cloud similar to the clouds from nuclear explosions.
The jet
stream blew the ash from Eyjafjallajokull over Europe, grounding hundreds of
thousands of flights due to unsafe levels of ash in the air that could clog jet
engines resulting in engine failure. To predict the ash concentration, scientists
use height of the plume and rate of eruption to determine how the ash is
transported. The current model for
determining plume height of bent ash columns requires the ambient wind
velocity, velocity of the ash cloud, and the rate that air mixes with the plume.
A recent study published
in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth has modified the
traditional model for bent ash clouds by incorporating the influence of ash
size on the plume. When grains are
greater than a few millimeters, it can fall out of the ash cloud before it
cools, resulting in the overall temperature of the ash cloud decreasing. Since heat affects how high the plume rises,
this loss of heat due to fallout plays an important role in determining the
height of the plume.
These
scientists tested their model against the 2010 Eyjafjallajokull eruption. When the effects of grain size were included
in the model, it more accurately predicted the plume height. They also found that detailed local meteorological
data was critical to model success. It superseded
the effects of tephra – without the atmospheric data, the simulated plume
underestimated the height of Eyjafjallajokull.
It is crucial
to develop these models for bent plumes because bent ash clouds are more often
produced by smaller eruptions, which are more frequent than large, catastrophic
ones. By developing models to study bent
eruption clouds, we can better predict where ash will spread during an eruption
and more strictly constrain ‘no-fly’ zones, limiting their economic impact.
Synopsis by Meghan Fisher
No comments:
Post a Comment